Two pressures work on the same acres. The first is straightforward: proposals to convert agricultural land to residential and commercial development, parcel by parcel, each one appearing modest on its own, but often carrying city-wide zoning changes.
The largest version of that risk involves landowners, some of whom hold a large share of the remaining acreage, for whom farming's margins no longer pencil out, in conversation with developers and consultants about entitlements residents did not ask for and do not want. We respect these landowners and the pressure they are under. Our interest is not in telling any of them no; it is in the harder, better work of building the agritourism system that other regions have already proven can make working this land some of the most profitable farming in the state. That is a conversation worth having together, not a fight.
The second is quieter. Oceanside built an agritourism vision to help farming survive: lower-intensity uses tied to production, adopted into the zoning ordinance in 2018, with the larger commercial questions deferred to a community plan the City Council itself called for. That plan is on hold, and higher-intensity commercial activity, event venues in particular, is now being considered parcel by parcel, ahead of the rules the city meant to write.
We support agritourism that serves a working farm. The code already says it should stay subordinate to active, viable farming. Our part is to keep that standard in view.
See how the agritourism vision was built, and where it stands